Augusts in Africa Read online

  Craig Boddington

  Bella Forest, Liberia

  March 2016

  Prologue

  I SPEAK OF AFRICA at the twilight.

  This is a book 40 years and more in the making: the span of over 500 full moons, the light of many falling on me on the world’s second largest continent. And the time was passed not within the confines of national parks or on the verandas of tourist lodges. I passed it, in short, as a safari tramp.

  It is of no special note to suggest that few other books of this kind are likely to be written from here forward, merely a reflection that the world discovered in them has passed on, or more to the point, retreated to a place of August days now lying in greater abundance in the past than are likely to be seen in the future. The Africa of four decades ago has receded, or been confined, to where it is of hardly any import to the “real” world of this early-yet-somehow-already-superannuated 21st century.

  There is a misconception about the wildness of Africa, by the way. Wilderness makes up a smaller percentage of its landmass than that of the earth as a whole. The greater part of Africa, outside megacities such as Lagos, Cairo, and Kinshasa, is a rural landscape of thin soils, inhabited by subsistence agriculturalists and pastoralists. If it were not for hunting areas, which in sub-Saharan Africa amount to some 540,000 square miles, two Texases, 120 percent of the land contained within African national parks, and not for the contentious practice of trophy hunting, wild animals would, for the most part, lack critical habitat and essential value, beyond the short term of bushmeat and illegal products, such as ivory. No amount of parks alone can halt the extinguishing of wildlife in Africa.

  Without hunting there is no other incentive but to turn the land over to livestock or hardscrabble farming, while killing or harassing any predators or herbivores who are drawn out of parks by the prospect of easy meals. By halting big-game hunting, wildlife is not only turned, perforce, into “problem” animals once it crosses park boundaries, subject to summary execution at indiscriminate numbers beyond all that are taken on license, but it is virtually impossible to maintain natural population dynamics within the artificial borders of those parks. If you believe Africa would be a better place with ever-dwindling numbers of big game within the limited confines of national parks, by all means lend your support to the prohibition of trophy hunting.

  Writing about Africa when you are not African, even ethnically, is fraught with imperiousness, bidding outrage. (Africa is Africans’, and the lions are now acquiring their historians.) When asked if that’s all you got, though, you have to say, that’s what I got.

  The once far wilder Africa known to hunters was a continent that could be written about with genuine passion only by an American, acknowledging how bumptious that sounds, and likely is. By the 1880s, for the vast majority of English, French, Germans, Portuguese, Belgians, even Italians, Spanish, and Arabs on the continent, Africa was no longer a land for the actual adventure of exploration or the frontierless wanderings of freebooters. From then till the time of uhuru and the “wind of change,” it was where third and fourth sons sought rewards, and many, though not all, of the daughters of traders and overseers sought out those sons in the hope of sharing in the rewards, which rather seldom materialized as robustly as might be desired. Even for the tribe of renegade white Africans of the nation of South Africa, the greater southern part of the continent was not about venturing but about lowering the bar of aristocracy to make “every man a king,” no matter the class in which he originated—as long as he could afford enough kaffirs to do the laundry, cook the meals, nappy the babies, and keep the num-num hedge trimmed neatly. And this made true adventure in Africa implausible, if not impossible, for them all.

  Americans, lacking the colonizer’s contemptuous familiarity, never shared such jaundiced—or simply unsentimental?—views of Africa. They stayed free of the scramble and mandates, establishing no colonies there as they concentrated on slaughtering the bison, persecuting the Indian, plowing under the decamillennial topsoil of their own plains and prairies, and annexing the ragged tatters of Spain’s insular empire. Not for us in Africa, at least, the provincial staples of, in the words of Graham Greene, broken contracts, resort to arms, gradual encroachment, or the wedding of martyrdom and absurdity. If for no other reason, we left Africa to the Old World because Americans make such atrocious colonists; the first time we tried we had the poor taste to become insurgents. In our foolhardy attempts at colonialism, typically on some far-flung archipelago, we strove to present a Quiet American façade to the rest of the world, as opposed to the impenitent cart-whip and Schutztruppe governance of the Great Powers (all right, there was the Philippines, to our disrepute, perhaps Vietnam, to our dismay, and some might argue about our motives in southwestern Asia; but we have certainly never demonstrated quite the same crude relish for subjugation as did the more enthusiastic colonizers of the 19th century, at least not firsthand, leaving it to surrogates often in the employ of fruit companies), inspiring in Africans in imperial yokes in the mid-20th century a longing for the day the good and just United States would appear with waves of fighter bombers in the sky and boots on the ground to liberate them, even though it was a promise only vaguely alluded to and certainly never to be kept. (The “bookish” Woodrow Wilson, it is suggested, offered in the wake of the First World War a rhetoric of self-determination that was the spark for the anti-colonial nationalism, and tribalism, that would enflame the 20th century, misguiding millions and enriching the ruthless few, as it turned out.)

  The Africa that Americans have always known most concretely existed in what we wrote about it in our works of hunting and exploration. Since the days of the nominal American Henry Morton Stanley and for every generation thereafter, Americans from Roosevelt to Hemingway to Ruark to Capstick to Boddington (who has been gracious enough to write a much appreciated foreword to this book, but who over and above that represents this era’s single most knowledgeable and significant authority on the African safari—there could hardly be anyone living, and few dead, who has ever had or will have more extensive experience on the continent, to which I can never possibly hope to hold even the smallest candle) defined Africa in ways that no European colonist ever would or could. The African adventures Americans sought most enthusiastically would have at best seemed frivolous to European colonials who viewed wild animals as, for the most part, impediments to commerce, such as farming and ranching, or as commerce themselves—commodities to be brought directly to market or to be sold to sportsmen who were largely Americans.

  Expatriates from Europe saw their Africa unromantically and dispassionately (and not a little imperiously) with what they took to be frosty logic in a tropic zone—recognizing it as a refuge from a checkered past, a place where the natives could do with uplifting (while doing the heavy lifting, unpoetically) a land in which one could get the most out of one’s remittance, or in homage to Leopold’s ghost, as a bottomless pit of resources ripe for the exploiting, even if hands needed lopping off now and then. And so it fell to a Dane (Denmark’s involvement in Africa never exceeding the odd trading post or two, and the sale and barter of Dane guns) to write “I had a farm in Africa. …” And a Chicago-born resident of Ernest Hemingway’s hometown of Oak Park to write Tarzan of the Apes when he had never seen Africa. (All the great English safari memoirs seem to have been written about times before the colonial era, and the best of the adventure tales, such as King Solomon’s Mines by the Norfolkman H. Rider Haggard, came out of experiences of an Africa prior to a Kenya Protectorate, Northern and Southern Rhodesia, the Royal Niger Company, or German East Africa.) Americans had the advantage of being able to come to Africa unencumbered by the accepted empiricisms of colonials.

  All of Africa was to Americans, even throughout most of the 20th century, uncharted, at least in their perception. The physical maps they drafted were, again according to Greene, “dashing,” demonstrating “a vigorous imagination” in which no European cartographer, not after the 19th cent
ury and the whimsy of features like the Mountains of Kong, dared to indulge. The “many blank spaces” that were the passion of Conrad were ones which Old World mapmakers prudently left as such, while they were inked in by New World cartographers according to frolics of their own. So terms such as “Cannibals” and “Dense Forest,” as well as dotted lines eschewed in favor of resolutely solid ones, to avoid any suggestion of uncertainty, were the creatively confident aspects Americans brought to the terra incognita on their maps of the “dark continent,” and even more so to the terra incognita of Africa contained in their minds.

  Forty years ago, the Africa I knew, and witnessed the changing of, was clearly at the beginning of the end of this impudence: of—in the southern Kenya country of the northern Serengeti, the Rift, escarpments, baobab, and fever trees—roaming at will across vast safari concessions with a lorry and a Land Cruiser; the insolence of tented camps, raised in hours and struck in less to set up in another place to test the hunting there; of the assumptive sense of an inalienable right to be in this land with its exceptionally strange and antipodal suggestions of the past wild America that for us of that 20th century had only been rumored. The raw arrogance of a young enthusiasm in the taking of animal life.

  Forty years ago I could still tap into the continuum of the experience of Africa known to other Americans from Stanley onward, in the same lands in which they had known them. Then it began to end, or, at the very least, to undergo irreversible alteration.

  Start with the closure of hunting in Kenya and consequent statistically tragic fate of its wildlife and system of conservation. For the safari, where not outlawed outright, the trend became one of crowding onto private lands with enclosed private stocks of wildlife, not to mention howls of execration toward aspects of the safari such as the killing of named, as well as maned, lions. Not that what I first experienced in Africa does not still survive in pockets here and there, but in those days that was the way “safari” was nearly everywhere it was carried out.

  The extreme unlikelihood of my ever repeating this kind of safari was never enough, though, to dissuade me from returning to assorted parts of Africa in the hope of finding something like “golden joys” once more. Even if what I did find might be something less or quite different from what I was expecting, it was always Africa. And like much of hunting and fishing, the most freedom to be enjoyed while being licensed.

  I have now come far enough to see that what stems from that quest are stories of a type not always likely to be taken seriously, at least not as seriously as they once might have been. The times in their wisdom will mark them as adrift in a limbo between travelogue and the dispatches of a flâneur, with serious writing on Africa today expected to be about issues of wildlife destruction, child soldiers, Islamic fanaticism, famine, transmissible diseases, and genocide. The stories in this book will be taken by some as silly or peripheral, or branded through an abundance of political correctness as unspeakable in this so enlightened day and age. Then you remember that what people do not consider a serious occupation is as important and has always been as important as all the things that are in fashion, as has been said.

  Therefore, here are stories I have from four decades of safari-ing in Africa, from among the most transforming days, weeks, and months of my life. There may even be readers, and things more curious have happened, who will peruse them with interest. For those who know it well, I hope these tales may be accurate reflections of their own experiences on the continent. For others, who have journeyed to Africa briefly, or even not at all, I would like to believe there is nonetheless a transporting insight or two to be found in them. And if there is more than one account on the hunting of the Cape buffalo, that is only because it, the buffalo, may simply represent the ideal combination (the “perfect game”) of size, strength, intelligence, potential hazard, and availability (you always want to hunt them again) to be found in any large wild animal, and indicative of what draws us back to Africa, in search of, if I may, existential experience and stories that are too good not to tell.

  I may say this is the last time I speak of Africa; but that is, of course, patently absurd. I am some remove, God willing, from being done with safari-ing there. Nobody quits Africa that readily. After all, I have not yet found what I am really looking for there, even if I am incapable of explaining, perhaps most acutely to myself, what it is that I am, like that leopard whose dried and frozen carcass was found close to the western summit of Kilimanjaro, seeking. I continue to search for the sources of my own Niles, the map to Ophir, to the heart very much not of darkness. I have no rationale, therefore, for not returning; quite the opposite. Regarding Africa, this is a case in which for me, an American, ignorance must assuredly be bliss.

  Africa Passing Relentlessly Beneath the Sun

  To Begin …

  The first story I ever published—when I was young and showed promise—with a hero with an unpronounceable name, is a text rife with overwrought, often personally distressing prose, the jejune insights of an insufferably callow youth with a magpie mind, besotted with Africa after one safari, and owing more than minor debts and revealing slavish devotion to better writers (a trait perhaps not restricted to this story). Whenever I am tempted to revise it, though, I remember that it is a snapshot, a schizzo, of when, returning from a week of hunting mule deer in Colorado, I was told I had a piece, after so many rejections, accepted for publication; and that night I lay in bed, staring at the tenebrous ceiling lit by reflected moonlight, dreaming that I might now be a writer, and dreaming all the other stories there would be to write. I could hardly know then that so many of them would be about something as arcane as hunting in Africa. If perhaps my first story had been about collecting Eurasian ghost orchids, you might now be reading an entirely other book.

  PROINSEAS PADRAIG O’CADLA, long used to having things his way, was surrounded by such an uncontrollable dynamism as to make him long for the abiding acedia of his adopted and distant Dublin. A hard man to please, he condescendingly found the fatalism of the Irish Republic to be the perfect counterpoint to his own adrenal disposition. Thus, armed with his bespoke English firearms and enough preconceptions to qualify as excess baggage, he had come here to find something no less than an off-the-rack brand of satori. Instead, under this high, East African, bright morning sky in sight of white-capped Kilimanjaro, he had not found a single placid person he could feel easily superior toward. It was not, to be sure, what he had bargained for.

  Mketi and Mmaku, for example, who were hunkered under the wait-a-bit bush, were laughing excitedly at the bwana as he missed too many convenient wingshots to be conscionable. They had, of course, seen him consecrating the previous day’s windfall kill with glass after glass of French brandy and phonetic interpretations of Turkana war chants long into the night. Had they asked, and had he understood, he would have explained carefully the near impossibility of hitting sandgrouse while a hangover (the precise size, shape, and texture of a tennis ball) burrowed into your skull.

  “Ndio, ndio,” they told him, pointing to the flock of sandgrouse as the birds drew in their wings and began to fall precipitously toward the steel-colored river like a shower of arrowheads.

  “Very well, gentlemen,” he expressed in his high-priced English. “I have borne your mockery sufficiently long.” Bringing the double purposefully to his shoulder, he took the first bird with the right-hand barrel and swung fluidly back to take the second with the left. Pleased no end with himself, he watched them make their feathered falls to the ground, like leaves drifting.

  Mmaku was up at once and running with a natural grace any number of years of professional dance training could not impart. He collected the two birds and brought them to O’Cadla who handled them gently and approvingly, savoring their fading warmth. Here then, for a life deficient in very real moments, was one. And if that was a fiction, it did sustain him.

  He noticed that the African was also smiling, and he wondered if it was for the same reason. For O’Cadla, the sud
den deaths of animals were (he told himself) tragedies of a perfection no dramatist ever approximated; and to be the author of such a production invariably brought about in him emotions whose only outlet was a form of rictus. To wit: He just couldn’t keep from grinning.

  “We will go,” he said, motioning with his thumb to the hunting car. Mmaku waved to Mketi who brought the other birds and shell boxes. The Land Cruiser for O’Cadla, as he climbed in, had that unmistakable odor of a car long used to the cartage of dead game animals: canvas and amino acids.

  The camp by the river (dismissed as being too small for crocodiles until an old bull almost made off with the teenaged cookboy as he drew water) was nearly down by the time they returned. O’Cadla found Fisher on the big shortwave radio to Nairobi, making arrangements for the next hunting block. O’Cadla nodded to him as he passed, another destination in mind.

  A hundred yards beyond the parked lorry the vultures were congregating like conventioneers, while the marabou maintained a Hudibrastic disdain. As O’Cadla drew up on them they began to back away suspiciously and finally were forced to lift ponderously off the ground to roost with hunched shoulders in the surrounding acacias. In their wake they left a dusty, gray, skinned, boned carcass that at first might have been taken for that of a large and muscular headless man. Who had a tail.

  O’Cadla had been unprepared for it. They had found the spoor by chance and had trailed it a very short distance to a small grove of trees. He was waiting for them there, his head massive and sleepy and his coat tinted pale green by the shade. He stood, and O’Cadla took him down with a single 375 bullet, only to have him stand again. He was looking O’Cadla in the eye as he took the second bullet through his heart. It was not, somehow, how O’Cadla would have wanted or imagined it, and it only emphasized his growing sense of circumstances going beyond his usual ability to control them. As for the lion (even though, more than any single thing on the planet, he had succeeded in humbling this man, his killer), he had deserved better than he got.